<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is really to blame?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Jewish Thought and Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eddie</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-183199</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-183199</guid>
		<description>Rosenblum claims in the Langer case that ".. voiding her husband’s conversion, despite the fact that he had been living as a fully observant Jew for decades."

This is well known to be false, the man was eatign Pig even when he married and "converted".  He couldnt even complete the first line of Shema - does that make him fully observant?
A bunch of lies were told abotu Rav Goren, largely becasue he was a Torah great who also served in the army, and had independent opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosenblum claims in the Langer case that &#8220;.. voiding her husband’s conversion, despite the fact that he had been living as a fully observant Jew for decades.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is well known to be false, the man was eatign Pig even when he married and &#8220;converted&#8221;.  He couldnt even complete the first line of Shema - does that make him fully observant?<br />
A bunch of lies were told abotu Rav Goren, largely becasue he was a Torah great who also served in the army, and had independent opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvmay</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-176412</link>
		<dc:creator>cvmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-176412</guid>
		<description>Normally, the writer responds to the comments made by the bloggers. Is there any reason that we have not heard from Jonathan Rosenblum back on this issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally, the writer responds to the comments made by the bloggers. Is there any reason that we have not heard from Jonathan Rosenblum back on this issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elitzur</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173664</link>
		<dc:creator>Elitzur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173664</guid>
		<description>To Lawrence at 33, 
1) I have not heard the tape of R' Henkin... All I have is R' Rakeffet's words that he heard the tape of R' Henkin agreeing with R' Goren...

2) The comment about mamzerus is independent of R' Henkin's opinion. Any possible safek is used to try to be matir a mamzer while the same safek may not be used in general (except maybe aguna). Just look at R' Moshe's t'shuvos on mamzerus. The suggestion that just like R' Goren revoked a gairus so to here is ludicrous because R' Goren was dealing with a case of mamzerus (not to mention the other points I made above).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Lawrence at 33,<br />
1) I have not heard the tape of R&#8217; Henkin&#8230; All I have is R&#8217; Rakeffet&#8217;s words that he heard the tape of R&#8217; Henkin agreeing with R&#8217; Goren&#8230;</p>
<p>2) The comment about mamzerus is independent of R&#8217; Henkin&#8217;s opinion. Any possible safek is used to try to be matir a mamzer while the same safek may not be used in general (except maybe aguna). Just look at R&#8217; Moshe&#8217;s t&#8217;shuvos on mamzerus. The suggestion that just like R&#8217; Goren revoked a gairus so to here is ludicrous because R&#8217; Goren was dealing with a case of mamzerus (not to mention the other points I made above).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLEL</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173556</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173556</guid>
		<description>TO ALL:

Any discussion of conversion must recognize that we live in a time when there is strong political pressure by the Israeli Government to perform mass conversions:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180960627948&#38;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO ALL:</p>
<p>Any discussion of conversion must recognize that we live in a time when there is strong political pressure by the Israeli Government to perform mass conversions:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180960627948&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull" rel="nofollow">http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180960627948&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLEL</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173470</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173470</guid>
		<description>MARK:

You've basically confirmed my worst fears about the EJF.

The couples who come to EJF are not primarily interested in getting closer to G-D. They need to solve a strategic problem in raising children or compatibility.

They are probably very nice people, but that is not a sufficient reason to accept converts. They cn become riteous gentiles, observing the 7 laws of Noah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARK:</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve basically confirmed my worst fears about the EJF.</p>
<p>The couples who come to EJF are not primarily interested in getting closer to G-D. They need to solve a strategic problem in raising children or compatibility.</p>
<p>They are probably very nice people, but that is not a sufficient reason to accept converts. They cn become riteous gentiles, observing the 7 laws of Noah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173348</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-173348</guid>
		<description>Does the existence of a process such as EJF's actually encourage intermarriage in any way?  If it does not, what could be EJF's downside?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the existence of a process such as EJF&#8217;s actually encourage intermarriage in any way?  If it does not, what could be EJF&#8217;s downside?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172605</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172605</guid>
		<description>Hillel:
"I suppose my uneasiness with the EJF is its institutional nature. It seems to make coversion routine, which it should not be."

No, you're uneasiness lies in the fact that you admittedly don't know much about it. I have my reservations about certain aspects of the EJF but I at least, took the time to attend a conference before commenting on them.

"A convert should be an exceptional person, who has made a life-changing decision. Such a person is rare."
In studying the Gemara, Rambam, Shulchan Aruch, and others, I don't believe this comment/sentiment is found anywhere. What Halachah is unambiguous about is that the convert must be sincere in his/her intent and the Beis Din must sense that sincerity. It makes no mention of how common or rare it is for that person to present himself before a Beis Din.

"Let’s say Chaim marries Mary and settles in Vermont. How does the EJF come into the picture. Do they solicit Chaim? Does he contact them? I just don’t understand how this process works."

Key words there. 
Believe it or not, many intermarried couples are very uncomfortable with their decisions for a variety of factors. It may be due to pressure exerted on them by their parents, an inherent sense that something is not right about it, a book, an article...They may love their non-Jewish partner but issues arise especially once children show up and questions of how to raise them crop up and then they start to explore Judaism in earnest. These people speak to friends and so on and so forth and many express grave regret for their past decisions or wish they could have known more at the time. Problem is now they're parents of children, own a house together etc... Simply breaking it up is not the easiest thing in the world for many and constitutes a challenge they're not ready to face. These people are directed to the EJF that is well-known in many circles and EJF will host them at a conference where they'll taste authentic Judaism for the first time in their lives. EJF will explain why it's important for two parents to be Jewish and committed to Torah ideals. EJF will offer the Jewish parent assistance with studying more about Judaism and if the non-Jewish spouse is interested, they'll help them as well. When the couple eventually decides to move ahead, EJF will put them in touch with a very reputable Beis Din and the Beis Din will take over the process started by EJF. There  are no corners cut at all. What they do is give these people a chance they never had or knew even existed.

I know of a few couples helped by the EJF and I am amazed at the incredible steps they've taken and more importantly, by their sincerity. I don't work for EJF and other than attend a conference, I've never been in contact with them personally, but I'd hesitate to criticize their work because they're the only ones doing it and they're doing it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillel:<br />
&#8220;I suppose my uneasiness with the EJF is its institutional nature. It seems to make coversion routine, which it should not be.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, you&#8217;re uneasiness lies in the fact that you admittedly don&#8217;t know much about it. I have my reservations about certain aspects of the EJF but I at least, took the time to attend a conference before commenting on them.</p>
<p>&#8220;A convert should be an exceptional person, who has made a life-changing decision. Such a person is rare.&#8221;<br />
In studying the Gemara, Rambam, Shulchan Aruch, and others, I don&#8217;t believe this comment/sentiment is found anywhere. What Halachah is unambiguous about is that the convert must be sincere in his/her intent and the Beis Din must sense that sincerity. It makes no mention of how common or rare it is for that person to present himself before a Beis Din.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let’s say Chaim marries Mary and settles in Vermont. How does the EJF come into the picture. Do they solicit Chaim? Does he contact them? I just don’t understand how this process works.&#8221;</p>
<p>Key words there.<br />
Believe it or not, many intermarried couples are very uncomfortable with their decisions for a variety of factors. It may be due to pressure exerted on them by their parents, an inherent sense that something is not right about it, a book, an article&#8230;They may love their non-Jewish partner but issues arise especially once children show up and questions of how to raise them crop up and then they start to explore Judaism in earnest. These people speak to friends and so on and so forth and many express grave regret for their past decisions or wish they could have known more at the time. Problem is now they&#8217;re parents of children, own a house together etc&#8230; Simply breaking it up is not the easiest thing in the world for many and constitutes a challenge they&#8217;re not ready to face. These people are directed to the EJF that is well-known in many circles and EJF will host them at a conference where they&#8217;ll taste authentic Judaism for the first time in their lives. EJF will explain why it&#8217;s important for two parents to be Jewish and committed to Torah ideals. EJF will offer the Jewish parent assistance with studying more about Judaism and if the non-Jewish spouse is interested, they&#8217;ll help them as well. When the couple eventually decides to move ahead, EJF will put them in touch with a very reputable Beis Din and the Beis Din will take over the process started by EJF. There  are no corners cut at all. What they do is give these people a chance they never had or knew even existed.</p>
<p>I know of a few couples helped by the EJF and I am amazed at the incredible steps they&#8217;ve taken and more importantly, by their sincerity. I don&#8217;t work for EJF and other than attend a conference, I&#8217;ve never been in contact with them personally, but I&#8217;d hesitate to criticize their work because they&#8217;re the only ones doing it and they&#8217;re doing it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLEL</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172526</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172526</guid>
		<description>To Jacob Haller:

Good points.

What I should have asked--rhetorically--more precisely, was: "Is Judaism nothing MORE than a social service agency?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Jacob Haller:</p>
<p>Good points.</p>
<p>What I should have asked&#8211;rhetorically&#8211;more precisely, was: &#8220;Is Judaism nothing MORE than a social service agency?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLEL</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172478</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172478</guid>
		<description>Mark:

I suppose my uneasiness with the EJF is its institutional nature. It seems to make coversion routine, which it should not be.

A convert should be an exceptional person, who has made a life-changing decision. Such a person is rare.

Let's say Chaim marries Mary and settles in Vermont. How does the EJF come into the picture. Do they solicit Chaim? Does he contact them? I just don't understand how this process works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark:</p>
<p>I suppose my uneasiness with the EJF is its institutional nature. It seems to make coversion routine, which it should not be.</p>
<p>A convert should be an exceptional person, who has made a life-changing decision. Such a person is rare.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say Chaim marries Mary and settles in Vermont. How does the EJF come into the picture. Do they solicit Chaim? Does he contact them? I just don&#8217;t understand how this process works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Haller</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Haller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172402</guid>
		<description>Hillel wrote

"However, unlike the Jews of Ezra HaSofer’s time (second Bais HaMikDash), who did Teshuva by divorcing their gentile wives, these Jews in the EJF remain married to their gentile wives."

How accurate is the analogy?  One can likely deduce that those who intermarried in the time of Ezra HaSofer were much more knowledgable in halacha at the time of their ill-fitted unions then those who participated in the EJF conference.  Those who underwent Geyrus are no longer married to "gentile wives".

Regarding the sarcastic(?) question of whether Judaism is now a social service agency:  Satmar Bikur Cholim, Tomche Shabbos, SBCO, Ohel, to name just a few are probably some of the most organized and dedicated service agencies in the world. 

Also, perhaps it benefits us to go slow before making assumptions about the intentions of the couples going through Geyrus before details are examined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillel wrote</p>
<p>&#8220;However, unlike the Jews of Ezra HaSofer’s time (second Bais HaMikDash), who did Teshuva by divorcing their gentile wives, these Jews in the EJF remain married to their gentile wives.&#8221;</p>
<p>How accurate is the analogy?  One can likely deduce that those who intermarried in the time of Ezra HaSofer were much more knowledgable in halacha at the time of their ill-fitted unions then those who participated in the EJF conference.  Those who underwent Geyrus are no longer married to &#8220;gentile wives&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regarding the sarcastic(?) question of whether Judaism is now a social service agency:  Satmar Bikur Cholim, Tomche Shabbos, SBCO, Ohel, to name just a few are probably some of the most organized and dedicated service agencies in the world. </p>
<p>Also, perhaps it benefits us to go slow before making assumptions about the intentions of the couples going through Geyrus before details are examined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meir</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172239</link>
		<dc:creator>meir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172239</guid>
		<description>Can all who complain "hypochrisy" please link a particular written article so that we can see for ourselves if the claim is true that the critics of R. Goren opposed *ANY* form of revocation of an old conversion or they felt that this particular incident did not fit the rule?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can all who complain &#8220;hypochrisy&#8221; please link a particular written article so that we can see for ourselves if the claim is true that the critics of R. Goren opposed *ANY* form of revocation of an old conversion or they felt that this particular incident did not fit the rule?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-172121</guid>
		<description>According to some philosophers :-)
minor surgery = surgery on someone else
major surgery = surgery on me
minor gadol = gadol whose hashkafah I disagree with
major gadol = gadol whose hashkafah I agree with

KT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to some philosophers <img src='http://www.cross-currents.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
minor surgery = surgery on someone else<br />
major surgery = surgery on me<br />
minor gadol = gadol whose hashkafah I disagree with<br />
major gadol = gadol whose hashkafah I agree with</p>
<p>KT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Student</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171858</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171858</guid>
		<description>"are Rabbis Shapiro and Kook major gedolim?"

Yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;are Rabbis Shapiro and Kook major gedolim?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171670</guid>
		<description>Hillel writes:
"If the EJF is dealing with Jews who truly want to do Teshuva, that might be a different story.
However, unlike the Jews of Ezra HaSofer’s time (second Bais HaMikDash), who did Teshuva by divorcing their gentile wives, these Jews in the EJF remain married to their gentile wives. Even if we assume that these wives are prepared to “go along” with conversion to make their husbands happy, is this an acceptable basis for accepting a convert?"

Once again - the EJF does not do the conversion. They refer them to an appropriate Beis Din [and they only work with seriously reputable Batei Din] which makes the evaluation. They don't cut any corners along the way. All the EJF does is educate the couple that the choice exists and assist them in preparing for the conversion once they're interest is piqued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillel writes:<br />
&#8220;If the EJF is dealing with Jews who truly want to do Teshuva, that might be a different story.<br />
However, unlike the Jews of Ezra HaSofer’s time (second Bais HaMikDash), who did Teshuva by divorcing their gentile wives, these Jews in the EJF remain married to their gentile wives. Even if we assume that these wives are prepared to “go along” with conversion to make their husbands happy, is this an acceptable basis for accepting a convert?&#8221;</p>
<p>Once again - the EJF does not do the conversion. They refer them to an appropriate Beis Din [and they only work with seriously reputable Batei Din] which makes the evaluation. They don&#8217;t cut any corners along the way. All the EJF does is educate the couple that the choice exists and assist them in preparing for the conversion once they&#8217;re interest is piqued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewish Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171633</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewish Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171633</guid>
		<description>"at lease one major Gadol did support R. Goren – R. Yosef Eliyahu Henkin Z”TL."

"Rav Avraham Shapiro and Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook also supported him."

- are Rabbis Shapiro and Kook major gedolim?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;at lease one major Gadol did support R. Goren – R. Yosef Eliyahu Henkin Z”TL.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Rav Avraham Shapiro and Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook also supported him.&#8221;</p>
<p>- are Rabbis Shapiro and Kook major gedolim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossi Ginzberg</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171579</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossi Ginzberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171579</guid>
		<description>I suspect an error here in attributing Rav Goren's rise to chief Rabbi as a  reward for his ruling in this case,because the ruling itself was published by the Heichal shlomo publishing arm of the Chief rabbinate, indicating that he was the chief rabbi BEFORE that happened.

Not to speak of the fact that since almost all the  chareidi world was opposed to Rav Goren, proving acceptability of a Torah position by him is quite disingenuous. Can you imagine defending a psak of Rabbi Elyahshiv by saying that Rabbi Slifkin ruled similarly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect an error here in attributing Rav Goren&#8217;s rise to chief Rabbi as a  reward for his ruling in this case,because the ruling itself was published by the Heichal shlomo publishing arm of the Chief rabbinate, indicating that he was the chief rabbi BEFORE that happened.</p>
<p>Not to speak of the fact that since almost all the  chareidi world was opposed to Rav Goren, proving acceptability of a Torah position by him is quite disingenuous. Can you imagine defending a psak of Rabbi Elyahshiv by saying that Rabbi Slifkin ruled similarly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence M. Reisman</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171561</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence M. Reisman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171561</guid>
		<description>Eliztur calls me off base in questioning Rav Henkin's support of Rav Goren, saying, "Though R’ Henkin was blind at the time his vioce is on tape defending R’ Goren."  Sorry, but unless you can produce a good provenance for the tape, I can't accept it.  The evidence is clear that in addition to being blind, Rav Henkin suffered significant mental impairment in his last years.  Furthermore, given his machmir stance on the need for a get most of this life, it seems highly unlikely that he would support Rav Goren on this matter.

"2) We’re always maykil as much as possible to avoid mamzerut – zil kri bay rav hu." Given Rav Henkin's shitos on the need for a get, I'm not so sure he'd agree with this.

"3) Rosenblum certainly would be the one defending the attack on R’ Goren"  Absolutely correct, and this is what bothers me about the defense.  If Rav Goren was wrong then, Rav Attiyah is definitely wrong now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliztur calls me off base in questioning Rav Henkin&#8217;s support of Rav Goren, saying, &#8220;Though R’ Henkin was blind at the time his vioce is on tape defending R’ Goren.&#8221;  Sorry, but unless you can produce a good provenance for the tape, I can&#8217;t accept it.  The evidence is clear that in addition to being blind, Rav Henkin suffered significant mental impairment in his last years.  Furthermore, given his machmir stance on the need for a get most of this life, it seems highly unlikely that he would support Rav Goren on this matter.</p>
<p>&#8220;2) We’re always maykil as much as possible to avoid mamzerut – zil kri bay rav hu.&#8221; Given Rav Henkin&#8217;s shitos on the need for a get, I&#8217;m not so sure he&#8217;d agree with this.</p>
<p>&#8220;3) Rosenblum certainly would be the one defending the attack on R’ Goren&#8221;  Absolutely correct, and this is what bothers me about the defense.  If Rav Goren was wrong then, Rav Attiyah is definitely wrong now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171505</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171505</guid>
		<description>Gil Student said,
"I believe that Rav Henkin’s position was that no one should have a position unless they know all of the intimate details of the case."

If this principle applied to bloggers, what would happen to blogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gil Student said,<br />
&#8220;I believe that Rav Henkin’s position was that no one should have a position unless they know all of the intimate details of the case.&#8221;</p>
<p>If this principle applied to bloggers, what would happen to blogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence M. Reisman</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171474</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence M. Reisman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171474</guid>
		<description>Charedi Leumi writes with regard to the Langer case that "Rav Avraham Shapiro and Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook also supported him."[Rav Goren].  As to Rav Shapiro, I can't say, but my understanding is that Rab ZY Kook was opposed to the decision.  However, Rav Goren told him that unless he supported it, he (Rav Goren) would resign as chief rabbi and thereby throw the entire chief rabbis office into turmoil.  Rather than risk that, Rav ZY Kook kept silent.

It should be noted that in the election for chief rabbi in which Rav Goren replaced Rav Unterman, Rav ZY Kook was a vociferous supporter of Rav Unterman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charedi Leumi writes with regard to the Langer case that &#8220;Rav Avraham Shapiro and Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook also supported him.&#8221;[Rav Goren].  As to Rav Shapiro, I can&#8217;t say, but my understanding is that Rab ZY Kook was opposed to the decision.  However, Rav Goren told him that unless he supported it, he (Rav Goren) would resign as chief rabbi and thereby throw the entire chief rabbis office into turmoil.  Rather than risk that, Rav ZY Kook kept silent.</p>
<p>It should be noted that in the election for chief rabbi in which Rav Goren replaced Rav Unterman, Rav ZY Kook was a vociferous supporter of Rav Unterman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Student</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171472</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171472</guid>
		<description>I believe that Rav Henkin's position was that no one should have a position unless they know all of the intimate details of the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Rav Henkin&#8217;s position was that no one should have a position unless they know all of the intimate details of the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elitzur</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171445</link>
		<dc:creator>Elitzur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171445</guid>
		<description>1) Your facts are wrong... as mentioned in 8 - R' Rakeffet has a number of shiurim on the Langer controversy - you can get them from yutorah.org - the way R' Goren was able to matir the mamzerim is, in fact, because he had supporting documents identifying the father as a non-Jew (certainly not someone who had been observant for 30 years). Comment 24 is completely off-base. Though R' Henkin was blind at the time his vioce is on tape defending R' Goren.
2) We're always maykil as much as possible to avoid mamzerut - zil kri bay rav hu.
3) Rosenblum certainly would be the one defending the attack on R' Goren
4) Conversion under less-than-optimal halachic circumstances has a long history in halacha - in the writings of R' Moshe Feinstein, R' D.T. Hoffman, R' Uziel, and many others
5) The fact that Attia decided to call other rabbis criminals and the like demonstrates that his actions have nothing to do with halacha

I could almost feel bad for Rosenblum who has to defend these types of actions. But actually I really don't...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Your facts are wrong&#8230; as mentioned in 8 - R&#8217; Rakeffet has a number of shiurim on the Langer controversy - you can get them from yutorah.org - the way R&#8217; Goren was able to matir the mamzerim is, in fact, because he had supporting documents identifying the father as a non-Jew (certainly not someone who had been observant for 30 years). Comment 24 is completely off-base. Though R&#8217; Henkin was blind at the time his vioce is on tape defending R&#8217; Goren.<br />
2) We&#8217;re always maykil as much as possible to avoid mamzerut - zil kri bay rav hu.<br />
3) Rosenblum certainly would be the one defending the attack on R&#8217; Goren<br />
4) Conversion under less-than-optimal halachic circumstances has a long history in halacha - in the writings of R&#8217; Moshe Feinstein, R&#8217; D.T. Hoffman, R&#8217; Uziel, and many others<br />
5) The fact that Attia decided to call other rabbis criminals and the like demonstrates that his actions have nothing to do with halacha</p>
<p>I could almost feel bad for Rosenblum who has to defend these types of actions. But actually I really don&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLEL</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171443</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-171443</guid>
		<description>To Mark and Ori:

If the EJF is dealing with Jews who truly want to do Teshuva, that might be a different story.

However, unlike the Jews of Ezra HaSofer's time (second Bais HaMikDash), who did Teshuva by divorcing their gentile wives, these Jews in the EJF remain married to their gentile wives. Even if we assume that these wives are prepared to "go along" with conversion to make their husbands happy, is this an acceptable basis for accepting a convert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mark and Ori:</p>
<p>If the EJF is dealing with Jews who truly want to do Teshuva, that might be a different story.</p>
<p>However, unlike the Jews of Ezra HaSofer&#8217;s time (second Bais HaMikDash), who did Teshuva by divorcing their gentile wives, these Jews in the EJF remain married to their gentile wives. Even if we assume that these wives are prepared to &#8220;go along&#8221; with conversion to make their husbands happy, is this an acceptable basis for accepting a convert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chareidi Leumi</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-170799</link>
		<dc:creator>Chareidi Leumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-170799</guid>
		<description>&#62;at lease one major Gadol did support R. Goren – R. Yosef Eliyahu Henkin Z”TL.

Rav Avraham Shapiro and Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook also supported him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;at lease one major Gadol did support R. Goren – R. Yosef Eliyahu Henkin Z”TL.</p>
<p>Rav Avraham Shapiro and Rav Zvi Yehuda Kook also supported him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ori Pomerantz</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-170595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ori Pomerantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-170595</guid>
		<description>Hillel: &lt;i&gt;Jonathan: I don’t understand the premise of the EJF. These people have thembed their nose at their people by marrying out of the faith. Why should we busy trying to make things kosher, when they don’t really care about Judaism and Halacha?&lt;/i&gt;

Ori: The people who actually come to EJF are those who want to do Tshuva. Most intermarried Jews couldn't care less about it. Do you think one should help somebody who wants to do Tshuva, or reject such a person for previous transgressions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillel: <i>Jonathan: I don’t understand the premise of the EJF. These people have thembed their nose at their people by marrying out of the faith. Why should we busy trying to make things kosher, when they don’t really care about Judaism and Halacha?</i></p>
<p>Ori: The people who actually come to EJF are those who want to do Tshuva. Most intermarried Jews couldn&#8217;t care less about it. Do you think one should help somebody who wants to do Tshuva, or reject such a person for previous transgressions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-170590</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2007/06/03/who-is-really-to-blame/#comment-170590</guid>
		<description>Hillel writes:
"Jonathan: I don’t understand the premise of the EJF. These people have thembed their nose at their people by marrying out of the faith. Why should we busy trying to make things kosher, when they don’t really care about Judaism and Halacha?
Is this what Judaism has become—some kind of social service agency?"

Hillel,

This comment could not be further off the mark. These people most certainly didn't thumb their noses at Judaism. They'd never been exposed to it and had no basis for not intermarrying. If you think they made a conscious decision to reject Judaism you're making a terrible mistake. 

Speak to them yourself or to someone active in Kiruv and you'll see that they believe that they've done nothing wrong. It's only later in the game that SOME of them become aware of the gravity of the situation and they deserve tremendous kudos for taking steps toward Judaism at the point in their life. We owe it to them to assist them in their return the same way we help out all other Jews.

JR wrote,
"The organization also promotes a universally accepted standard for conversion. It has already sponsored numerous conferences for rabbinical court judges in the United States and Israel, and one is scheduled in the near future for Europe."

While it's true that the org. sponsors these conferences and seeks to educate the rabbis in some of the finer points of the issue, it does not really promote a universal standard for conversion. This is what I discovered when I attended a conference of theirs. These words were bandied around a lot there but Rabbi Tropper then spoke and explained that they don't intend to do that but rather to make rabbis more effective and knowledgeable and hope that they maintain proper standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillel writes:<br />
&#8220;Jonathan: I don’t understand the premise of the EJF. These people have thembed their nose at their people by marrying out of the faith. Why should we busy trying to make things kosher, when they don’t really care about Judaism and Halacha?<br />
Is this what Judaism has become—some kind of social service agency?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hillel,</p>
<p>This comment could not be further off the mark. These people most certainly didn&#8217;t thumb their noses at Judaism. They&#8217;d never been exposed to it and had no basis for not intermarrying. If you think they made a conscious decision to reject Judaism you&#8217;re making a terrible mistake. </p>
<p>Speak to them yourself or to someone active in Kiruv and you&#8217;ll see that they believe that they&#8217;ve done nothing wrong. It&#8217;s only later in the game that SOME of them become aware of the gravity of the situation and they deserve tremendous kudos for taking steps toward Judaism at the point in their life. We owe it to them to assist them in their return the same way we help out all other Jews.</p>
<p>JR wrote,<br />
&#8220;The organization also promotes a universally accepted standard for conversion. It has already sponsored numerous conferences for rabbinical court judges in the United States and Israel, and one is scheduled in the near future for Europe.&#8221;</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s true that the org. sponsors these conferences and seeks to educate the rabbis in some of the finer points of the issue, it does not really promote a universal standard for conversion. This is what I discovered when I attended a conference of theirs. These words were bandied around a lot there but Rabbi Tropper then spoke and explained that they don&#8217;t intend to do that but rather to make rabbis more effective and knowledgeable and hope that they maintain proper standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
