<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100 Years of the Mishnah Berurah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Jewish Thought and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<meta name="generator" content="Blog 7.2" />
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micha Berger</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/comment-page-1/#comment-73123</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/#comment-73123</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, many of his peers disagreed with Rav Aharon Kotler -- including Rav Hutner (Chaim Berlin), Rav Y. Yaakov Weinber (Ner Israel), and my own rebbe, Rav Dovid Lifshitz (the Suvalker Rav and RIETS).

Personally, I advocate an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aishdas.org/luach/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Arukh haShulchan Yomi&lt;/a&gt; program. Partly because of my rebbe&#039;s advice when I got married, that it be the guide to be used on questions that do not require I got to a rabbi. Partly also because it has more of the mechanics of the halachic process, as opposed to the Mishnah Berurah&#039;s orientation toward citing sources without explaning the logic of their positions. It makes it easier to stick to for daily learning.

It&#039;s clear that Rav Yisrael Meir haKohein (Kagan) personally did not intend the Mishnah Berurah to serve in the role it does. To give two examples: The becher he used at the seder was inherited by his daughter and measured. It&#039;s not large enough according to the Mishnah Berurah. Another: He didn&#039;t wear his tzitzis strings out, even though the primary source for the contemporary practice of those who do so (including myself) is the Mishnah Berurah.

The shift from a survey and theoretic discussion to a halachic guide was a program of Rav Aharon Kotler&#039;s. Now, I&#039;m not going to say that following the Mishnah Berurah pragmatically is any less a good idea because one is following Rav Aharon rather than the Chafeitz Chaim by doing so. But I just want to be clear. It also explains why this tendency is slightly less true in yeshivos less connected to Lakewood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, many of his peers disagreed with Rav Aharon Kotler &#8212; including Rav Hutner (Chaim Berlin), Rav Y. Yaakov Weinber (Ner Israel), and my own rebbe, Rav Dovid Lifshitz (the Suvalker Rav and RIETS).</p>
<p>Personally, I advocate an <a href="http://www.aishdas.org/luach/" rel="nofollow">Arukh haShulchan Yomi</a> program. Partly because of my rebbe&#8217;s advice when I got married, that it be the guide to be used on questions that do not require I got to a rabbi. Partly also because it has more of the mechanics of the halachic process, as opposed to the Mishnah Berurah&#8217;s orientation toward citing sources without explaning the logic of their positions. It makes it easier to stick to for daily learning.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that Rav Yisrael Meir haKohein (Kagan) personally did not intend the Mishnah Berurah to serve in the role it does. To give two examples: The becher he used at the seder was inherited by his daughter and measured. It&#8217;s not large enough according to the Mishnah Berurah. Another: He didn&#8217;t wear his tzitzis strings out, even though the primary source for the contemporary practice of those who do so (including myself) is the Mishnah Berurah.</p>
<p>The shift from a survey and theoretic discussion to a halachic guide was a program of Rav Aharon Kotler&#8217;s. Now, I&#8217;m not going to say that following the Mishnah Berurah pragmatically is any less a good idea because one is following Rav Aharon rather than the Chafeitz Chaim by doing so. But I just want to be clear. It also explains why this tendency is slightly less true in yeshivos less connected to Lakewood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mycroft</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/comment-page-1/#comment-73059</link>
		<dc:creator>mycroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/#comment-73059</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reminder of one of the leading Jewish personalities of the past couple hundred years.
Technical point-didn&#039;t the Chafeitz Chaim live for 95 years rather than 105 years.
&quot;while his Mishnah Berurah is not even mentioned in the article.&quot;

historically-it appears that the Mishnah Berurah has received more acceptance as authoritative -- rather than the Chaii Adam, or Aruch Hashulchan for example after the Chafeitz Chaims p&#039;tirah.

BTW an interesting discussion would be can one not follow the Mishna Berurah and follow Aruch Hashulachan or Chaii Adam--it is probably not as obvious an answer as students of Rav Ahron Kotler ZT&quot;L assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder of one of the leading Jewish personalities of the past couple hundred years.<br />
Technical point-didn&#8217;t the Chafeitz Chaim live for 95 years rather than 105 years.<br />
&#8220;while his Mishnah Berurah is not even mentioned in the article.&#8221;</p>
<p>historically-it appears that the Mishnah Berurah has received more acceptance as authoritative &#8212; rather than the Chaii Adam, or Aruch Hashulchan for example after the Chafeitz Chaims p&#8217;tirah.</p>
<p>BTW an interesting discussion would be can one not follow the Mishna Berurah and follow Aruch Hashulachan or Chaii Adam&#8211;it is probably not as obvious an answer as students of Rav Ahron Kotler ZT&#8221;L assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mordechai</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/comment-page-1/#comment-73054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mordechai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/11/09/100-years-of-the-mishnah-berurah/#comment-73054</guid>
		<description>I recently heard a tape from Rav Simcha Wasserman, zarzal who attributed the following response to the Brisker Rav

         Someone once asked: if the Chofetz Chaim so wished to avoid fame, and was already praying that he not become known as a scholar, then why did he not also pray that he not become famous as a saint? The answer goes that it was so clear to the Chofetz Chaim himself that he was not a saint, that he never considered it necessary to pray that people recognize the obvious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently heard a tape from Rav Simcha Wasserman, zarzal who attributed the following response to the Brisker Rav</p>
<p>         Someone once asked: if the Chofetz Chaim so wished to avoid fame, and was already praying that he not become known as a scholar, then why did he not also pray that he not become famous as a saint? The answer goes that it was so clear to the Chofetz Chaim himself that he was not a saint, that he never considered it necessary to pray that people recognize the obvious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
