<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Question on Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Jewish Thought and Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rabbi Yonah</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-60562</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbi Yonah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 03:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-60562</guid>
		<description>Davar ha yotzei min ha leiv...
Just keep it coming from the heart and the soul.
Gut Voch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davar ha yotzei min ha leiv&#8230;<br />
Just keep it coming from the heart and the soul.<br />
Gut Voch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baruch Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-60120</link>
		<dc:creator>Baruch Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-60120</guid>
		<description>"I think your web page should have a “contact us” space for reactions which do not fit into the comments on a specific post as well as those which are not intended for publication."

I like that idea, as I often have such comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think your web page should have a “contact us” space for reactions which do not fit into the comments on a specific post as well as those which are not intended for publication.&#8221;</p>
<p>I like that idea, as I often have such comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-60025</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-60025</guid>
		<description>Cross-Currents is very much a blog.  As far as stating that a blog is about "whatever one feels like sharing", does anybody really share &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt;?  Many blogs also keep to certain parameters, but they wouldn't be considered any less to be a blog.  So, too, it is with Cross-Currents.  I'm not sure whence that definition of a blog came, but it sounds a bit loose and in need of some more sharper defining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cross-Currents is very much a blog.  As far as stating that a blog is about &#8220;whatever one feels like sharing&#8221;, does anybody really share <i>everything</i>?  Many blogs also keep to certain parameters, but they wouldn&#8217;t be considered any less to be a blog.  So, too, it is with Cross-Currents.  I&#8217;m not sure whence that definition of a blog came, but it sounds a bit loose and in need of some more sharper defining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehoshua Friedman</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59992</link>
		<dc:creator>Yehoshua Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59992</guid>
		<description>I think your web page should have a "contact us" space for reactions which do not fit into the comments on a specific post as well as those which are not intended for publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your web page should have a &#8220;contact us&#8221; space for reactions which do not fit into the comments on a specific post as well as those which are not intended for publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59988</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59988</guid>
		<description>If a cross-currents.com discussion doesn't bore me or make me [too] mad and I learn something new, it's worthwhile.  Some personal content helps in understanding the person's argument, but some is self-indulgent.

I'd like to see the contributors of articles respond more often to the commenters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a cross-currents.com discussion doesn&#8217;t bore me or make me [too] mad and I learn something new, it&#8217;s worthwhile.  Some personal content helps in understanding the person&#8217;s argument, but some is self-indulgent.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see the contributors of articles respond more often to the commenters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YM</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59981</link>
		<dc:creator>YM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59981</guid>
		<description>I say post whatever you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say post whatever you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Spilzinger</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59941</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Spilzinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59941</guid>
		<description>I concur with Aryeh. To me a blog is more about the conversations and the cross-referencing that come about - a discussion. In the case of this blog, it is a discussion of the issues which touch upon the observant community here and abroad. Chazak V'Nischazek!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Aryeh. To me a blog is more about the conversations and the cross-referencing that come about - a discussion. In the case of this blog, it is a discussion of the issues which touch upon the observant community here and abroad. Chazak V&#8217;Nischazek!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumpy Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59868</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumpy Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59868</guid>
		<description>Speaking of haiku -- the first line of the Shema (שמע ישראל...אחד) - is a haiku:

שמע ישראל // five syllables
ה' אלקינו // seven syllables
ה' אחר    // five syllables</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of haiku &#8212; the first line of the Shema (שמע ישראל&#8230;אחד) - is a haiku:</p>
<p>שמע ישראל // five syllables<br />
ה&#8217; אלקינו // seven syllables<br />
ה&#8217; אחר    // five syllables</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liorah</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59866</link>
		<dc:creator>liorah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59866</guid>
		<description>Interesting. So, the readership is treated to an anomaly every once in awhile. It's nice, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. So, the readership is treated to an anomaly every once in awhile. It&#8217;s nice, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59864</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59864</guid>
		<description>Ever since I started working at AOL for the postmaster team, I've really started getting an appreciation for weird email problems...

I don't think offhand personal notes are a problem - writing long, off-topic screeds is another matter.

-DMZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since I started working at AOL for the postmaster team, I&#8217;ve really started getting an appreciation for weird email problems&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think offhand personal notes are a problem - writing long, off-topic screeds is another matter.</p>
<p>-DMZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aryeh</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59863</link>
		<dc:creator>Aryeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/06/20/a-question-on-blogging/#comment-59863</guid>
		<description>IMHO, the less personal content the better.  I don't think the point of Cross-Currents should be to discuss the personal feelings and musings of R. Menken, R. Rosenblum, R' Feldman etc.  There are enough blogs out there that spam one with irrelevant and uninteresting personal feelings.  If one's interested in somebody else's personal side, then they should try to get to know it in realspace, not cyberspace.  Besides, cyberspace tends to distort the personal side, in my experience.
Or at the very least, it doesn't seem to be a good idea to mix the two.  
Perhaps a separate blog:  Cross-currents:  Up Close and Personal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, the less personal content the better.  I don&#8217;t think the point of Cross-Currents should be to discuss the personal feelings and musings of R. Menken, R. Rosenblum, R&#8217; Feldman etc.  There are enough blogs out there that spam one with irrelevant and uninteresting personal feelings.  If one&#8217;s interested in somebody else&#8217;s personal side, then they should try to get to know it in realspace, not cyberspace.  Besides, cyberspace tends to distort the personal side, in my experience.<br />
Or at the very least, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be a good idea to mix the two.<br />
Perhaps a separate blog:  Cross-currents:  Up Close and Personal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
