<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internet and Rabbinic Bans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Jewish Thought and Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dovidul</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51428</link>
		<dc:creator>dovidul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51428</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I would be so interested to know how many YIDDESHE NESHOMALECH WERE EXPOSED TO THE DIRTIEST FILTH and what effect it has had on them in the long run.&lt;/em&gt;

I like many have unfortanatly happened on many sites that I wish i hadnt seen, but as wrong as those sites seem, they never effected me in a way that I felt destroyed my neshama. I have a more horible feeling after I send in my tax return and it bothers me to no end when i see other Jews make a chilul Hashem of any kind. It is those times that I question my Hihadus and wonder why we exist as a people.

I would really like to hear other opiinions on this matter, especially from those who know others that left the clan because of the unavoidable pictures.

duvidle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I would be so interested to know how many YIDDESHE NESHOMALECH WERE EXPOSED TO THE DIRTIEST FILTH and what effect it has had on them in the long run.</em></p>
<p>I like many have unfortanatly happened on many sites that I wish i hadnt seen, but as wrong as those sites seem, they never effected me in a way that I felt destroyed my neshama. I have a more horible feeling after I send in my tax return and it bothers me to no end when i see other Jews make a chilul Hashem of any kind. It is those times that I question my Hihadus and wonder why we exist as a people.</p>
<p>I would really like to hear other opiinions on this matter, especially from those who know others that left the clan because of the unavoidable pictures.</p>
<p>duvidle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51319</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51319</guid>
		<description>Michoel,
In plenty of neighborhoods people still have TVs and they watch with moderation.  Most people understand that not everything on TV should be watched just like the internet.  But if it took a ban on TVs to get rid of your tv then kol
hakovod to you.  I think that people spend too much time on the internet including myself and the time can be spent better on learning torah.  Of course one can spend hours on the internet watching and listening to various shiurim and can achieve a lot in learning so one has to know what is important in life.  

Regards from Yerushalyim,

Joshua</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michoel,<br />
In plenty of neighborhoods people still have TVs and they watch with moderation.  Most people understand that not everything on TV should be watched just like the internet.  But if it took a ban on TVs to get rid of your tv then kol<br />
hakovod to you.  I think that people spend too much time on the internet including myself and the time can be spent better on learning torah.  Of course one can spend hours on the internet watching and listening to various shiurim and can achieve a lot in learning so one has to know what is important in life.  </p>
<p>Regards from Yerushalyim,</p>
<p>Joshua</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michoel</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51218</link>
		<dc:creator>Michoel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51218</guid>
		<description>Joshua,
People had TVs, enjoyed them and then stopped having them.  It became a stigma in frum communities.  It was not a sudden community wide hisorerus d'l'satta.  The ban was effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua,<br />
People had TVs, enjoyed them and then stopped having them.  It became a stigma in frum communities.  It was not a sudden community wide hisorerus d&#8217;l&#8217;satta.  The ban was effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ja</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51201</link>
		<dc:creator>ja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51201</guid>
		<description>"The point is, if you put our good and reasonable information, it will eventually have some effect, perhaps even generate real change. The same is true about these rabbinic bans. Their effect may not be immediate or manifest, but they do matter."

They may or may not, but when it comes to tv, the rabbinic proclamations were not what had the effect.  What happened was that schools began only accepting kids from homes without tv. Schools are the agent of change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The point is, if you put our good and reasonable information, it will eventually have some effect, perhaps even generate real change. The same is true about these rabbinic bans. Their effect may not be immediate or manifest, but they do matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>They may or may not, but when it comes to tv, the rabbinic proclamations were not what had the effect.  What happened was that schools began only accepting kids from homes without tv. Schools are the agent of change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51153</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51153</guid>
		<description>Edvallace,
  I think people choose not to have a TV and it has nothing to do with a ban.  We do not have a TV because we do not
 want a TV.  Many people do not allow the internet in the house because they are concerned what will appear when they turn it on and nothing to do with a ban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edvallace,<br />
  I think people choose not to have a TV and it has nothing to do with a ban.  We do not have a TV because we do not<br />
 want a TV.  Many people do not allow the internet in the house because they are concerned what will appear when they turn it on and nothing to do with a ban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edvallace</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51149</link>
		<dc:creator>Edvallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51149</guid>
		<description>Joshua,

you write: 
"One last thing a number of years ago when a letter went out against televisions there was one gadol who didn’t sign it because he felt would people would still have TVs so it was not going to accomplish anything and therefore it would have a negative effect."

I hope you weren't using this to back up your point because all the evidence points to how wrong that person was. When I attended a very mainstream New York Yeshivah in my youth, there were only a handful of students [myself included] who didn't have TV's in their homes. Today, of those former classmates [36 in all] I doubt that even five of them have a TV in their homes. 

My own children attend more of a community type school with children from all backgrounds and very few of the kids have TV's in their homes. The ban on TV's has accomplished an enormous amount and we're all much better for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua,</p>
<p>you write:<br />
&#8220;One last thing a number of years ago when a letter went out against televisions there was one gadol who didn’t sign it because he felt would people would still have TVs so it was not going to accomplish anything and therefore it would have a negative effect.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope you weren&#8217;t using this to back up your point because all the evidence points to how wrong that person was. When I attended a very mainstream New York Yeshivah in my youth, there were only a handful of students [myself included] who didn&#8217;t have TV&#8217;s in their homes. Today, of those former classmates [36 in all] I doubt that even five of them have a TV in their homes. </p>
<p>My own children attend more of a community type school with children from all backgrounds and very few of the kids have TV&#8217;s in their homes. The ban on TV&#8217;s has accomplished an enormous amount and we&#8217;re all much better for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliezer Barzilai</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51147</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliezer Barzilai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51147</guid>
		<description>Joshua, I too know gedolim that avoid signing those proclamations because they feel they are ineffective and divisive. This reminds me of Ralph Nader, who never focused on mandating seat belts because he was convinced that Americans could never be made to wear them, so he worked on structural safety issues instead.  He was wrong; most rational people (i.e., non-smokers) do wear belts now. The point is, if you put our good and reasonable information, it will eventually have some effect, perhaps even generate real change. The same is true about these rabbinic bans. Their effect may not be immediate or manifest, but they do matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua, I too know gedolim that avoid signing those proclamations because they feel they are ineffective and divisive. This reminds me of Ralph Nader, who never focused on mandating seat belts because he was convinced that Americans could never be made to wear them, so he worked on structural safety issues instead.  He was wrong; most rational people (i.e., non-smokers) do wear belts now. The point is, if you put our good and reasonable information, it will eventually have some effect, perhaps even generate real change. The same is true about these rabbinic bans. Their effect may not be immediate or manifest, but they do matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51142</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51142</guid>
		<description>The internet is here to stay in fact there will be a new internet service starting soon.
The new service will also have rabbinical approval. If you do a google search on google.co.il
and type in hebrew glattnet you will find it.

  Now I personally think that if we were to ban something we should ban money.  Money corrupts people and can lead people to do terrible things.  Of course this will not happen because most people worship money and people who have money.  I know of one person although he had to fund raise he never worshipped money and that person was the great Rav Ahron Soloveichik.

  One last thing a number of years ago when a letter went out against televisions there was one gadol who didn't sign it because he felt would people would still have TVs so it was not going to accomplish anything and therefore it would have a negative effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The internet is here to stay in fact there will be a new internet service starting soon.<br />
The new service will also have rabbinical approval. If you do a google search on google.co.il<br />
and type in hebrew glattnet you will find it.</p>
<p>  Now I personally think that if we were to ban something we should ban money.  Money corrupts people and can lead people to do terrible things.  Of course this will not happen because most people worship money and people who have money.  I know of one person although he had to fund raise he never worshipped money and that person was the great Rav Ahron Soloveichik.</p>
<p>  One last thing a number of years ago when a letter went out against televisions there was one gadol who didn&#8217;t sign it because he felt would people would still have TVs so it was not going to accomplish anything and therefore it would have a negative effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliezer Barzilai</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51108</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliezer Barzilai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51108</guid>
		<description>To the extent that Dr. Shick's post was a protest against visiting the sins of the parents on their children, I think most of us agree with him.
However, it is ironic that many of us bemoan the absence of central authority in the orthodox community, and then turn around and gripe when authority is exercised, thus inhibiting the development of that type of authority here in the US by the death of one thousand cuts.  There is a yiddish expression that describes this phenomenon-- "burcherin."  I know that I have a very strong tradition in Jewish law and theology, and I know that I would not like anyone but Reb Moshe telling me what to do, but I would happily give up that autonomy to live in a community that had clearly stated standards and practices, as was the case in many shtetlach in Europe.  That's certainly better than endless and debilitating bickering about eiruvin, kashrus, school dress codes and mikva'os.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the extent that Dr. Shick&#8217;s post was a protest against visiting the sins of the parents on their children, I think most of us agree with him.<br />
However, it is ironic that many of us bemoan the absence of central authority in the orthodox community, and then turn around and gripe when authority is exercised, thus inhibiting the development of that type of authority here in the US by the death of one thousand cuts.  There is a yiddish expression that describes this phenomenon&#8211; &#8220;burcherin.&#8221;  I know that I have a very strong tradition in Jewish law and theology, and I know that I would not like anyone but Reb Moshe telling me what to do, but I would happily give up that autonomy to live in a community that had clearly stated standards and practices, as was the case in many shtetlach in Europe.  That&#8217;s certainly better than endless and debilitating bickering about eiruvin, kashrus, school dress codes and mikva&#8217;os.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaakov Menken</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51103</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaakov Menken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51103</guid>
		<description>Yisroel Moshe, Rabbi Reinman became involved with a book project and decided that he had to take a 'hiatus' from C-C. This began before the ban and to the best of my knowledge he has not changed his mind about returning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yisroel Moshe, Rabbi Reinman became involved with a book project and decided that he had to take a &#8216;hiatus&#8217; from C-C. This began before the ban and to the best of my knowledge he has not changed his mind about returning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51101</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Ban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51101</guid>
		<description>All sentences in “quotations” are quoted from Marvin Shick..
– “The Internet is indispensable to most people in business and for lawyers and other professionals.”
Correct. A ban was never issued on not having internet in business.
– “It is a key source for needed medical information,”
Ever heard of Echo Medical Referals (718-859-9800)? I’d trust them a 100 times more than “askthedoctor.com”
– “a money and time saver for shoppers and it is vital for air travel.”
vital??? Did you forget how to use a phone? Ever heard of a Travel Agent???
Lets be clear. The issuers of the ban didn’t proclaim “Internet is Assur”. They said internet has no place in a Jewish home.
In the average Jewish home, how often do people fly? Once a year? Twice a year? Does the average Jewish home need “medical information” – Daily? Weekly? (I have 6 kids at home. Is it two or three a year that I may have needed medical information?)
Can someone please explain why the internet is “vital” for a Jewish home???????????
(And please don’t write that you need it for parnosah. For that you can get an Ishur.)
A time saver?
How many hours does the average internet user end up wasting time surfing?
Money Saver?
We all know that it cost to be a Jew. Isn’t non kosher food a lot cheaper? So is non modest clothing. So if the Gedolim say not to have internet in a Jewish home, and thereby I can’t save money by shopping online, then its just part of being a Jew. (Just like we spend $ 15 a pound on matzos etc…)
And true that the Torah is chas al mamon shel yisroel, but not at the risk of a danger that with one click, a yiddeshe neshoma can be totally destroyed. Don’t deny it. Its happened.
– “Inadvertently, the employment of harsh measures conveys a lack of faith in the ability of our schools and community, as well as our parents, to properly guide our children.”
At what point did they issue the ban?
After the NUMEROUS STORIES THAT YIDDESHE NESHOMALECH WERE EXPOSED TO THE DIRTIEST FILTH.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE “ABILITY” OF THOSE PARENTS TO GUIDE THEIR CHILDREN??
In who should the Gedolim have faith? In curious not so innocent teenagers walking around with laptops and wireless cards??
What will the gedolim answer in shamayim when asked – What did you do to stop the danger? Oh, we had “faith” in the schools and parents??
I would like to know in what way will my kids will be deprived that I don’t have in my house internet/computer/TV/video ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All sentences in “quotations” are quoted from Marvin Shick..<br />
– “The Internet is indispensable to most people in business and for lawyers and other professionals.”<br />
Correct. A ban was never issued on not having internet in business.<br />
– “It is a key source for needed medical information,”<br />
Ever heard of Echo Medical Referals (718-859-9800)? I’d trust them a 100 times more than “askthedoctor.com”<br />
– “a money and time saver for shoppers and it is vital for air travel.”<br />
vital??? Did you forget how to use a phone? Ever heard of a Travel Agent???<br />
Lets be clear. The issuers of the ban didn’t proclaim “Internet is Assur”. They said internet has no place in a Jewish home.<br />
In the average Jewish home, how often do people fly? Once a year? Twice a year? Does the average Jewish home need “medical information” – Daily? Weekly? (I have 6 kids at home. Is it two or three a year that I may have needed medical information?)<br />
Can someone please explain why the internet is “vital” for a Jewish home???????????<br />
(And please don’t write that you need it for parnosah. For that you can get an Ishur.)<br />
A time saver?<br />
How many hours does the average internet user end up wasting time surfing?<br />
Money Saver?<br />
We all know that it cost to be a Jew. Isn’t non kosher food a lot cheaper? So is non modest clothing. So if the Gedolim say not to have internet in a Jewish home, and thereby I can’t save money by shopping online, then its just part of being a Jew. (Just like we spend $ 15 a pound on matzos etc…)<br />
And true that the Torah is chas al mamon shel yisroel, but not at the risk of a danger that with one click, a yiddeshe neshoma can be totally destroyed. Don’t deny it. Its happened.<br />
– “Inadvertently, the employment of harsh measures conveys a lack of faith in the ability of our schools and community, as well as our parents, to properly guide our children.”<br />
At what point did they issue the ban?<br />
After the NUMEROUS STORIES THAT YIDDESHE NESHOMALECH WERE EXPOSED TO THE DIRTIEST FILTH.<br />
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE “ABILITY” OF THOSE PARENTS TO GUIDE THEIR CHILDREN??<br />
In who should the Gedolim have faith? In curious not so innocent teenagers walking around with laptops and wireless cards??<br />
What will the gedolim answer in shamayim when asked – What did you do to stop the danger? Oh, we had “faith” in the schools and parents??<br />
I would like to know in what way will my kids will be deprived that I don’t have in my house internet/computer/TV/video &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michoel</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51097</link>
		<dc:creator>Michoel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51097</guid>
		<description>It would be useful to have to actual text of the ban posted so we can comment intelligently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be useful to have to actual text of the ban posted so we can comment intelligently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yisrael Moshe</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51090</link>
		<dc:creator>Yisrael Moshe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51090</guid>
		<description>I noticed that R' Reinman has not posted in a while.  Is it because of the ban?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that R&#8217; Reinman has not posted in a while.  Is it because of the ban?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLEL</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51085</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51085</guid>
		<description>Dear Reb Chaim.

I'm a bit surprised at the bitterness of your invective against Satmar and Lakewood.

The overwhelming majority of the fine people in those communities mind their own business and do not participate in politics. Those who do are the exception, who prove the rule.

Satmar is THE address for anyone who needs a helping hand. They have an incredible variety of volunteer Torah lecturers in any subject imaginable. They are a bedrock source of support for many non-Satmar groups, who do not have the clout to go it alone, as witness their leadership role in the current battle over traditional circumcision in New York City.

Lakewood is a beacon of Torah, providing a reliable source of Torah scholars for communities all over the united States.

If there are significant numbers of people in Lakewood who object to the high standards that have been set by the Roshei Yeshiva, they are free to organize their own educational system that reflects their standards. They have no right to force the existing community to downgrade its standards to accomodate theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Reb Chaim.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit surprised at the bitterness of your invective against Satmar and Lakewood.</p>
<p>The overwhelming majority of the fine people in those communities mind their own business and do not participate in politics. Those who do are the exception, who prove the rule.</p>
<p>Satmar is THE address for anyone who needs a helping hand. They have an incredible variety of volunteer Torah lecturers in any subject imaginable. They are a bedrock source of support for many non-Satmar groups, who do not have the clout to go it alone, as witness their leadership role in the current battle over traditional circumcision in New York City.</p>
<p>Lakewood is a beacon of Torah, providing a reliable source of Torah scholars for communities all over the united States.</p>
<p>If there are significant numbers of people in Lakewood who object to the high standards that have been set by the Roshei Yeshiva, they are free to organize their own educational system that reflects their standards. They have no right to force the existing community to downgrade its standards to accomodate theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaakov Menken</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51083</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaakov Menken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51083</guid>
		<description>I think Dr. Schick overstates the case, offering up unsubstantiated fears. Who is being expelled? Who is being refused admission? Amanda is mistaken, because individual responsibility is an absolute requirement here, without which the whole endeavor fails. The Roshei Yeshiva are simply setting a standard. It is up to each family to decide whether and how to comply -- it is not as if someone is going to go from house to house, seeing if the computers have active Internet accounts and also finding out which Rabbi permitted them.

Because I employ people who work from home in Lakewood, as well as in Israel, I am somewhat familiar with how real-world families address this ban. In one case, someone who was working only a few hours a week decided it was not worthwhile. But that does not apply to all of those for whom their work is a significant source of income.

One family first approached one of the rabbinic judges in Lakewood appointed to permit exceptions -- he asked a few questions and decided immediately that it was okay. This family, however, did not only want permission, they wanted to know that they were truly doing the right thing.

So although it took a month or two, they were able to get an appointment with Rav Matisyahu Solomon, the Mashgiach. He again asked how they were doing things -- which involves password-protection such that only the wife, who is the relevant employee, has access. He made it clear to them that not only is it permitted, but it is absolutely fine.

Is it not true that there are dozens of Torah schools where the family is expected to not own a television? We surely don't imagine that everyone complies, but how many children have been expelled for violations? Yet no one can deny the positive impact that the no-TV policies have had on an entire generation of Torah Jews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Dr. Schick overstates the case, offering up unsubstantiated fears. Who is being expelled? Who is being refused admission? Amanda is mistaken, because individual responsibility is an absolute requirement here, without which the whole endeavor fails. The Roshei Yeshiva are simply setting a standard. It is up to each family to decide whether and how to comply &#8212; it is not as if someone is going to go from house to house, seeing if the computers have active Internet accounts and also finding out which Rabbi permitted them.</p>
<p>Because I employ people who work from home in Lakewood, as well as in Israel, I am somewhat familiar with how real-world families address this ban. In one case, someone who was working only a few hours a week decided it was not worthwhile. But that does not apply to all of those for whom their work is a significant source of income.</p>
<p>One family first approached one of the rabbinic judges in Lakewood appointed to permit exceptions &#8212; he asked a few questions and decided immediately that it was okay. This family, however, did not only want permission, they wanted to know that they were truly doing the right thing.</p>
<p>So although it took a month or two, they were able to get an appointment with Rav Matisyahu Solomon, the Mashgiach. He again asked how they were doing things &#8212; which involves password-protection such that only the wife, who is the relevant employee, has access. He made it clear to them that not only is it permitted, but it is absolutely fine.</p>
<p>Is it not true that there are dozens of Torah schools where the family is expected to not own a television? We surely don&#8217;t imagine that everyone complies, but how many children have been expelled for violations? Yet no one can deny the positive impact that the no-TV policies have had on an entire generation of Torah Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaim Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51082</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaim Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51082</guid>
		<description>"Rebbe Teitelbaum learned from this experience and decided that he would focus only on his own followers, from whom he demanded Maximum standards—he succeeded in building one of the largest Chassidic communities in America.

Lakewood was built by Horav Aaron Kotler, who demanded maximum standards—it is a resounding success. Don’t mess with this successful formula."

Satmar &#38; Lakewood, resounding success?  Satmar fighting a civil war in the streets and in secular court, Lakewood rudderless and out of touch with its founding principles, two fine examples of success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rebbe Teitelbaum learned from this experience and decided that he would focus only on his own followers, from whom he demanded Maximum standards—he succeeded in building one of the largest Chassidic communities in America.</p>
<p>Lakewood was built by Horav Aaron Kotler, who demanded maximum standards—it is a resounding success. Don’t mess with this successful formula.&#8221;</p>
<p>Satmar &amp; Lakewood, resounding success?  Satmar fighting a civil war in the streets and in secular court, Lakewood rudderless and out of touch with its founding principles, two fine examples of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edvallace</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51081</link>
		<dc:creator>Edvallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51081</guid>
		<description>Joel,

you write:
Evidencing an interesting bias – anyone to my “left” is anything goes.
KT

FYI I don't live in Lakewood so don't make silly assumptions. I chose not to move to Lakewood in large part because I didn't want to be beholden to that mindset but I don't begrudge the ones who do and that was my point. BP is Chassidish, Monsey's a mix and Teaneck is more along the lines of MO and that was precisely what I was trying to demonstrate. None of them have rigid standards imposed upon them by anyone and people are free to do as they wish. If you don't like the Lakewood model don't live there. There are enough options out there for all. But don't write about it as if they're trying to control the frum world either.

Cyrk, 
You write:
1. How snotty of you! No one reading Cross-Currents wants ‘anything goes’.Ed, This is the same psychology which puts honest working people on the level of a baal hogola 2. Boro Park can only be equated with Teaneck by someone ignorant of Jewish sociology. It seems to me that Lakewood is the new chareidi suburbia more than a yeshiva community.

I'll leave your gratuitous insults aside and ask you to refer to what I wrote to Joel just above. I obviously have internet [not in my home but in full view of my secretaries and it's locked down pretty securely] and I'm no longer learning full time so get off your soapbox and read what I wrote. When I say "anything goes" I do not mean that people actually watch adult movies. I mean that you are free to do as you please without reckoning with a ban imposed by others. That's it. Fairly simple I believe. 
I am aware that BP and Teaneack are different [FWIW - I grew up in BP] and that was my point. You can stop worrying about the ban and live in any number of places you choose. But if you choose to live in Lakewood and reap the benefits of living in a community which is centered around a Yeshivah, be prepared for the Roshei Yeshivah to impose their will in some form or another. When it happens don't cry for pity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel,</p>
<p>you write:<br />
Evidencing an interesting bias – anyone to my “left” is anything goes.<br />
KT</p>
<p>FYI I don&#8217;t live in Lakewood so don&#8217;t make silly assumptions. I chose not to move to Lakewood in large part because I didn&#8217;t want to be beholden to that mindset but I don&#8217;t begrudge the ones who do and that was my point. BP is Chassidish, Monsey&#8217;s a mix and Teaneck is more along the lines of MO and that was precisely what I was trying to demonstrate. None of them have rigid standards imposed upon them by anyone and people are free to do as they wish. If you don&#8217;t like the Lakewood model don&#8217;t live there. There are enough options out there for all. But don&#8217;t write about it as if they&#8217;re trying to control the frum world either.</p>
<p>Cyrk,<br />
You write:<br />
1. How snotty of you! No one reading Cross-Currents wants ‘anything goes’.Ed, This is the same psychology which puts honest working people on the level of a baal hogola 2. Boro Park can only be equated with Teaneck by someone ignorant of Jewish sociology. It seems to me that Lakewood is the new chareidi suburbia more than a yeshiva community.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave your gratuitous insults aside and ask you to refer to what I wrote to Joel just above. I obviously have internet [not in my home but in full view of my secretaries and it's locked down pretty securely] and I&#8217;m no longer learning full time so get off your soapbox and read what I wrote. When I say &#8220;anything goes&#8221; I do not mean that people actually watch adult movies. I mean that you are free to do as you please without reckoning with a ban imposed by others. That&#8217;s it. Fairly simple I believe.<br />
I am aware that BP and Teaneack are different [FWIW - I grew up in BP] and that was my point. You can stop worrying about the ban and live in any number of places you choose. But if you choose to live in Lakewood and reap the benefits of living in a community which is centered around a Yeshivah, be prepared for the Roshei Yeshivah to impose their will in some form or another. When it happens don&#8217;t cry for pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51078</link>
		<dc:creator>S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51078</guid>
		<description>&#62;This requires a certain sacrifice and will certainly make it hard on some but that’s something one needs to take into consideration when moving to that community.

A lot of people were already living in Lakewood prior to a few months ago, who didn't move to a community that doesn't allow parents to use the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;This requires a certain sacrifice and will certainly make it hard on some but that’s something one needs to take into consideration when moving to that community.</p>
<p>A lot of people were already living in Lakewood prior to a few months ago, who didn&#8217;t move to a community that doesn&#8217;t allow parents to use the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin Schick</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51075</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin Schick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51075</guid>
		<description>As I reflect on the comments to what I wrote in the RJJ Newsletter about the
Lakewood Internet ban, it occurs to me that two points need to be
underscored.  The first is that while I believe that the ban itself is
unwise, my primary complaint concerns the expulsion or refusal to admit
children to a school.  I regard such a policy as sinful.

Secondly, while it is not possible to assert with certainty what Rav Aharon
Kotler, ztl, would do under contemporary circumstances I am confident that
he would not in any fashion endorse a blanket policy of expulsion.  He was
quite tolerant when it came to basic Torah education and he did not follow
in this regard the path exemplified by the Satmar Rebbe, ztl, as is evident
in his students sending their children to the local co-educational day
school, his leadership of Torah Umesorah and his establishment of Chinuch
Atzmai or Torah schools for Israel.  For more on this subject, there is the
essay that I wrote eighteen years ago at his 25th Yahrzeit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I reflect on the comments to what I wrote in the RJJ Newsletter about the<br />
Lakewood Internet ban, it occurs to me that two points need to be<br />
underscored.  The first is that while I believe that the ban itself is<br />
unwise, my primary complaint concerns the expulsion or refusal to admit<br />
children to a school.  I regard such a policy as sinful.</p>
<p>Secondly, while it is not possible to assert with certainty what Rav Aharon<br />
Kotler, ztl, would do under contemporary circumstances I am confident that<br />
he would not in any fashion endorse a blanket policy of expulsion.  He was<br />
quite tolerant when it came to basic Torah education and he did not follow<br />
in this regard the path exemplified by the Satmar Rebbe, ztl, as is evident<br />
in his students sending their children to the local co-educational day<br />
school, his leadership of Torah Umesorah and his establishment of Chinuch<br />
Atzmai or Torah schools for Israel.  For more on this subject, there is the<br />
essay that I wrote eighteen years ago at his 25th Yahrzeit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyrk</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51073</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyrk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51073</guid>
		<description>Edvallace:
&lt;i&gt;If you want a place that tries to uphold a certain standard . . .&lt;/i&gt;
1.  How snotty of you!  &lt;b&gt;No one&lt;/b&gt; reading Cross-Currents wants 'anything goes'.  We all have standards we rigorously adhere to, otherwise we wouldn't be here. 
Ed, This is the same psychology which puts honest working people on the level of a &lt;i&gt;baal hogola&lt;/i&gt; (or worse) while elevating a &lt;i&gt;kolel yunger man&lt;/i&gt; who misuses government funds to stay in &lt;i&gt;lernen&lt;/i&gt; to sainthood (and before you start thinking anything else, all of my children, including married ones with children of their own are learning full time and I'm proud of them)
2.  Boro Park can only be equated with Teaneck by someone ignorant of Jewish sociology.  It seems to me that Lakewood is the new &lt;i&gt;chareidi&lt;/i&gt; suburbia more than a yeshiva community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edvallace:<br />
<i>If you want a place that tries to uphold a certain standard . . .</i><br />
1.  How snotty of you!  <b>No one</b> reading Cross-Currents wants &#8216;anything goes&#8217;.  We all have standards we rigorously adhere to, otherwise we wouldn&#8217;t be here.<br />
Ed, This is the same psychology which puts honest working people on the level of a <i>baal hogola</i> (or worse) while elevating a <i>kolel yunger man</i> who misuses government funds to stay in <i>lernen</i> to sainthood (and before you start thinking anything else, all of my children, including married ones with children of their own are learning full time and I&#8217;m proud of them)<br />
2.  Boro Park can only be equated with Teaneck by someone ignorant of Jewish sociology.  It seems to me that Lakewood is the new <i>chareidi</i> suburbia more than a yeshiva community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menachem Petrushka</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51069</link>
		<dc:creator>Menachem Petrushka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51069</guid>
		<description>Although I think it is an avla(wrong) for the Lakewood leadership not to accept students whose families do not adhere to their standards, the Lakewood Kehila is in its rights as a voluntary organization. 

However that being said, I have no intention of supporting the Lakewood mosdos. I am commanded to teach my son Torah and the obligation to support Torah flows from that. Since the Lakewood mosdos would not accept my son, I do not consider myself bound to help them.  

My father learned in Kletzk and has always considered himself a talmid of Rav Aharon and has supported BMG to the best of his abilities. It would pain him to find out that his Rebbe's grandsons would expel his own grandson from mesivtah.

Memo to the Lakewood Cheder School: Please stop sending me the wall calendars. 

Menachem Petrushka</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I think it is an avla(wrong) for the Lakewood leadership not to accept students whose families do not adhere to their standards, the Lakewood Kehila is in its rights as a voluntary organization. </p>
<p>However that being said, I have no intention of supporting the Lakewood mosdos. I am commanded to teach my son Torah and the obligation to support Torah flows from that. Since the Lakewood mosdos would not accept my son, I do not consider myself bound to help them.  </p>
<p>My father learned in Kletzk and has always considered himself a talmid of Rav Aharon and has supported BMG to the best of his abilities. It would pain him to find out that his Rebbe&#8217;s grandsons would expel his own grandson from mesivtah.</p>
<p>Memo to the Lakewood Cheder School: Please stop sending me the wall calendars. </p>
<p>Menachem Petrushka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51053</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51053</guid>
		<description>The problem I have with bans like these, (the one on cell phones as well as the 'Net, and books), is that it removes individual responsibility from the picture. I think some Roshei Yeshiva are taking their calling as shepherd of the flock a little too seriously. The technology isn't all bad.  

It's enabled someone in my position literally to be able to accomplish tasks most of you take for granted. It's also very easy to avoid smut and ideas that don't mesh with your particular hashkafah. All it takes is a little self-discippline, and discippline on the part of parents. Get a hardware firewall, block everything by default, and select the sites you want to allow through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have with bans like these, (the one on cell phones as well as the &#8216;Net, and books), is that it removes individual responsibility from the picture. I think some Roshei Yeshiva are taking their calling as shepherd of the flock a little too seriously. The technology isn&#8217;t all bad.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s enabled someone in my position literally to be able to accomplish tasks most of you take for granted. It&#8217;s also very easy to avoid smut and ideas that don&#8217;t mesh with your particular hashkafah. All it takes is a little self-discippline, and discippline on the part of parents. Get a hardware firewall, block everything by default, and select the sites you want to allow through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLEL</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51052</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51052</guid>
		<description>This discussion reminds me of the differences of approach between  Horav Jacob Joseph, Rav Haklali in New York during the early 1900's and Rebbe Joel Teitelbaum, Satmar Rebbe, 50 years later.

Rav Joseph wanted to fix all of America by imposing minimal Kashrus standards--he failed and died of a broken heart. 

Rebbe Teitelbaum learned from this experience and decided that he would focus only on his own followers, from whom he demanded Maximum standards--he succeeded in building one of the largest Chassidic communities in America.

Lakewood was built by Horav Aaron Kotler, who demanded maximum standards--it is a resounding success. Don't mess with this successful formula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion reminds me of the differences of approach between  Horav Jacob Joseph, Rav Haklali in New York during the early 1900&#8217;s and Rebbe Joel Teitelbaum, Satmar Rebbe, 50 years later.</p>
<p>Rav Joseph wanted to fix all of America by imposing minimal Kashrus standards&#8211;he failed and died of a broken heart. </p>
<p>Rebbe Teitelbaum learned from this experience and decided that he would focus only on his own followers, from whom he demanded Maximum standards&#8211;he succeeded in building one of the largest Chassidic communities in America.</p>
<p>Lakewood was built by Horav Aaron Kotler, who demanded maximum standards&#8211;it is a resounding success. Don&#8217;t mess with this successful formula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeshivasociety.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51048</link>
		<dc:creator>yeshivasociety.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51048</guid>
		<description>What's most troubling about this ban (and every recent use of rabbinic force on the public recently) is not the ideas the rabbis are expressing but the manner in which they express them. The rabbis have not come out and said that using the internet is assur. So why did they ensure that no child in Lakewood who has internet in his house can have a frum education? Why was it neccesary to make all the schools agree to the same non halachic standards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s most troubling about this ban (and every recent use of rabbinic force on the public recently) is not the ideas the rabbis are expressing but the manner in which they express them. The rabbis have not come out and said that using the internet is assur. So why did they ensure that no child in Lakewood who has internet in his house can have a frum education? Why was it neccesary to make all the schools agree to the same non halachic standards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel rich</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/internet-and-rabbinic-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-51044</link>
		<dc:creator>joel rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2006/01/17/609/#comment-51044</guid>
		<description>Bottom line: If you want an open environment where anything goes, try Teaneck, Boro Park, Flatbush, Monsey to name a few. If you want a place that tries to uphold a certain standard move to Lakewood but don’t kvetch when standards are imposed.

Comment by Edvallace 
=====================
Evidencing an interesting bias - anyone to my "left" is anything goes.
KT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom line: If you want an open environment where anything goes, try Teaneck, Boro Park, Flatbush, Monsey to name a few. If you want a place that tries to uphold a certain standard move to Lakewood but don’t kvetch when standards are imposed.</p>
<p>Comment by Edvallace<br />
=====================<br />
Evidencing an interesting bias - anyone to my &#8220;left&#8221; is anything goes.<br />
KT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
