<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: End of heterodoxy, deja vu.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Jewish Thought and Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-47229</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/#comment-47229</guid>
		<description>"It seems to me less a contradiction than a Chumra, defining something as non Tzniut when either:

A. It is not Tzniut according to the prevailing culture.
B. It had not been Tzniut according to the prevailing culture for the last x centuries."

That's a nice theory, but could you show me where it's been codified? From what I've seen, no such codification exists.

-DMZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems to me less a contradiction than a Chumra, defining something as non Tzniut when either:</p>
<p>A. It is not Tzniut according to the prevailing culture.<br />
B. It had not been Tzniut according to the prevailing culture for the last x centuries.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a nice theory, but could you show me where it&#8217;s been codified? From what I&#8217;ve seen, no such codification exists.</p>
<p>-DMZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles B. Hall, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-47115</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles B. Hall, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/#comment-47115</guid>
		<description>Pants for women are permitted in some Orthodox environments. Here are two:

http://jewishoutdoorsclub.com/joc-fd.aspx?f=guide

http://www.kba.org.il/dati/dati-english/absorption.htm#religious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pants for women are permitted in some Orthodox environments. Here are two:</p>
<p><a href="http://jewishoutdoorsclub.com/joc-fd.aspx?f=guide" rel="nofollow">http://jewishoutdoorsclub.com/joc-fd.aspx?f=guide</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.kba.org.il/dati/dati-english/absorption.htm#religious" rel="nofollow">http://www.kba.org.il/dati/dati-english/absorption.htm#religious</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ori Pomerantz</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-47111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ori Pomerantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/#comment-47111</guid>
		<description>DMZ,

It seems to me less a contradiction than a Chumra, defining something as non Tzniut when either:

A. It is not Tzniut according to the prevailing culture.
B. It had not been Tzniut according to the prevailing culture for the last x centuries.

It seems similar to the way Yom Kippur is observed for 26 hours - in theory it is supposed to be 24. But we don't know EXACTLY when it is supposed to start, so we don't eat as soon as twilight starts, and we don't drink drink until it is full night on the following day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMZ,</p>
<p>It seems to me less a contradiction than a Chumra, defining something as non Tzniut when either:</p>
<p>A. It is not Tzniut according to the prevailing culture.<br />
B. It had not been Tzniut according to the prevailing culture for the last x centuries.</p>
<p>It seems similar to the way Yom Kippur is observed for 26 hours - in theory it is supposed to be 24. But we don&#8217;t know EXACTLY when it is supposed to start, so we don&#8217;t eat as soon as twilight starts, and we don&#8217;t drink drink until it is full night on the following day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-47091</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/#comment-47091</guid>
		<description>"What are the two conflicting mindsets about tzniut?"

Good question. Consider this:
1. Nose rings are considered non-tznius anymore, yet our matriarchs apparently thought they were. Why are they forbidden? Because the culture has changed.
2. Pants are considered non-tznius, yet the culture around us thinks they are modest and fine. Why are they forbidden? Because we don't change just because the culture around us has changed - pants weren't modest back in Europe, so they aren't now. (And to head off the argument, I'm not referring to tight, hip-hugging jeans.)

I think the contradiction is rather self-evident. I don't really care so much which mindset prevails so much as that _ONE_ of them does.

-DMZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What are the two conflicting mindsets about tzniut?&#8221;</p>
<p>Good question. Consider this:<br />
1. Nose rings are considered non-tznius anymore, yet our matriarchs apparently thought they were. Why are they forbidden? Because the culture has changed.<br />
2. Pants are considered non-tznius, yet the culture around us thinks they are modest and fine. Why are they forbidden? Because we don&#8217;t change just because the culture around us has changed - pants weren&#8217;t modest back in Europe, so they aren&#8217;t now. (And to head off the argument, I&#8217;m not referring to tight, hip-hugging jeans.)</p>
<p>I think the contradiction is rather self-evident. I don&#8217;t really care so much which mindset prevails so much as that _ONE_ of them does.</p>
<p>-DMZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ori Pomerantz</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-47065</link>
		<dc:creator>Ori Pomerantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/#comment-47065</guid>
		<description>DMZ,

What are the two conflicting mindsets about tzniut? 

 Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMZ,</p>
<p>What are the two conflicting mindsets about tzniut? </p>
<p> Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-47056</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/#comment-47056</guid>
		<description>A good Conservative friend of mine went toe to toe with the entire movement a few years ago over the issue of driving. He's shomer Shabbos, keeps kosher, and so forth. Anyways, he sent a letter to a particular Conservative journal about the matter - very well-researched, it was quite good to read. He didn't succeed in convincing many new people of his position, but you know what? At least he got a lot of respectful responses, and responses from the very leadership of that movement (eg, Schorsch, Joel, etc.).

That's one of the few things that I think the Conservative movement gets "right" - you're allowed to have a debate on the issues, and people treat you seriously if you've got a reasonable argument. The yeshiva world (and the MO world, to be honest) seem to get stuck in this rut of "well, that's how it's done, and we're not going to talk about it, let alone revisit it", despite some serious unresolved problems with said issue. A good example of this kind of issue would be tznius, where there's two conflicting mindsets applied at once - if I were to make a serious argument that we apply one or the other, but not both, that's just not going to get any serious response anymore.

-DMZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good Conservative friend of mine went toe to toe with the entire movement a few years ago over the issue of driving. He&#8217;s shomer Shabbos, keeps kosher, and so forth. Anyways, he sent a letter to a particular Conservative journal about the matter - very well-researched, it was quite good to read. He didn&#8217;t succeed in convincing many new people of his position, but you know what? At least he got a lot of respectful responses, and responses from the very leadership of that movement (eg, Schorsch, Joel, etc.).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the few things that I think the Conservative movement gets &#8220;right&#8221; - you&#8217;re allowed to have a debate on the issues, and people treat you seriously if you&#8217;ve got a reasonable argument. The yeshiva world (and the MO world, to be honest) seem to get stuck in this rut of &#8220;well, that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s done, and we&#8217;re not going to talk about it, let alone revisit it&#8221;, despite some serious unresolved problems with said issue. A good example of this kind of issue would be tznius, where there&#8217;s two conflicting mindsets applied at once - if I were to make a serious argument that we apply one or the other, but not both, that&#8217;s just not going to get any serious response anymore.</p>
<p>-DMZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah elias</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-47053</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah elias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/11/29/end-of-heterodoxy-deja-vu/#comment-47053</guid>
		<description>Wow, Beth Tfiloh is an Orthodox congregation?!  Knock me down with a feather!  Live and learn.

BTW, Rabbi Feldman describes how he got a mechitza into his shul in his book, "Tales out of Shul".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Beth Tfiloh is an Orthodox congregation?!  Knock me down with a feather!  Live and learn.</p>
<p>BTW, Rabbi Feldman describes how he got a mechitza into his shul in his book, &#8220;Tales out of Shul&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
