<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sir Francis Crick, DNA, and ID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Jewish Thought and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<meta name="generator" content="Blog 7.2" />
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More Answers, in case you didn&#8217;t know:-) &#171; Six Degrees of Paul Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-69209</link>
		<dc:creator>More Answers, in case you didn&#8217;t know:-) &#171; Six Degrees of Paul Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/#comment-69209</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/ " rel="nofollow">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/ </a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Packer</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-52317</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Packer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/#comment-52317</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sir Francis Crick, DNA, and ID&quot;

He was never knighted, so was not a &#039;Sir&#039;!

Martin Packer

http://www.packer34.freeserve.co.uk/rememberingfranciscrickacelebration.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sir Francis Crick, DNA, and ID&#8221;</p>
<p>He was never knighted, so was not a &#8216;Sir&#8217;!</p>
<p>Martin Packer</p>
<p><a href="http://www.packer34.freeserve.co.uk/rememberingfranciscrickacelebration.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.packer34.freeserve.co.uk/rememberingfranciscrickacelebration.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JewSpeak</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-44454</link>
		<dc:creator>JewSpeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/#comment-44454</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t believe this when I first read about Sir Francis Crick (full story) http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/did-life-form-by-accident.htm.

Afterwards I emailed some Professors at UCLA to see what is currently believed.  Most of them seemed to agree with his ideas.  I guess that is better than the alternative for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t believe this when I first read about Sir Francis Crick (full story) <a href="http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/did-life-form-by-accident.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/did-life-form-by-accident.htm</a>.</p>
<p>Afterwards I emailed some Professors at UCLA to see what is currently believed.  Most of them seemed to agree with his ideas.  I guess that is better than the alternative for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-44334</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/#comment-44334</guid>
		<description>As for this post&#039;s point... Drosnin, who made a fortune selling &quot;bible codes&quot; books, also found it easier, even given his belief that the &quot;codes&quot; are real, that aliens wrote the bible rather than that G-d did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for this post&#8217;s point&#8230; Drosnin, who made a fortune selling &#8220;bible codes&#8221; books, also found it easier, even given his belief that the &#8220;codes&#8221; are real, that aliens wrote the bible rather than that G-d did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-44333</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/#comment-44333</guid>
		<description>&quot;Darwin vs. Design&quot;? Darwin was himself a religious man, who studied to be an Anglican priest. My guess is that a guided evolution, G-d&#039;s hand hidden by mutation and natural selection, is more loyal to his original theory than Dawkins&#039; staunchly anti-religious stance.

In other words, there is nothing about Darwinism or neo-Darwinism that is &quot;versus&quot; design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Darwin vs. Design&#8221;? Darwin was himself a religious man, who studied to be an Anglican priest. My guess is that a guided evolution, G-d&#8217;s hand hidden by mutation and natural selection, is more loyal to his original theory than Dawkins&#8217; staunchly anti-religious stance.</p>
<p>In other words, there is nothing about Darwinism or neo-Darwinism that is &#8220;versus&#8221; design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JewishAtheist</title>
		<link>http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-44332</link>
		<dc:creator>JewishAtheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-currents.com/archives/2005/10/26/sir-francis-crick-dna-and-id/#comment-44332</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There’s certainly a lot more evidence for the Hand of G-d than there is for visiting space aliens&lt;/i&gt;

While I agree with your assessment of Crick&#039;s argument, I disagree with this statement.  We have overwhelming evidence that life exists on one planet.  We have overwhelming evidence that there exist billions of stars.  We have substantial evidence that a huge number of those stars have planets, many of which are older than Earth.  To me, aliens fall under the realm of the possible, based on the evidence we have.  I&#039;m not talking about UFO stories, of course, but actual aliens living on some distant planet.

There is no evidence for G-d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There’s certainly a lot more evidence for the Hand of G-d than there is for visiting space aliens</i></p>
<p>While I agree with your assessment of Crick&#8217;s argument, I disagree with this statement.  We have overwhelming evidence that life exists on one planet.  We have overwhelming evidence that there exist billions of stars.  We have substantial evidence that a huge number of those stars have planets, many of which are older than Earth.  To me, aliens fall under the realm of the possible, based on the evidence we have.  I&#8217;m not talking about UFO stories, of course, but actual aliens living on some distant planet.</p>
<p>There is no evidence for G-d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
